| Federal
Student Loan Limits
Current Situation:
The Federal Family
Education Loan Program (FFELP) and the Federal Direct Loan Program
(FDLP) have annual borrowing limits that are based on grade level.
The annual limits per grade level are listed in the chart
below:
| Grade
Level |
Subsidized
Limit |
Unsubsidized
Limit* |
|
Grade
1 (Freshmen) |
$2,625 |
$4,000 |
|
2 |
$3,500 |
$4000 |
|
3,4
and 5 |
$5,500
(per year) |
$5,000 |
|
Graduate
Students |
$8,500 |
$10,000 |
*The
unsubsidized amount for grades 1-5 is only awarded to student's
who are considered independents or whose parents are denied parent
loans for credit reasons.
Issues:
Since 1992 the average price of college
tuition has increased approximately 42%. The last time loan limits
were raise for first-year students was 1986. The last time loan
limits were raised for all other students was 1992. Loan limits
were not raised during the HEA reauthorization in 1998. We regret
this fact since we warned that without an increase in the federal
limits borrowers would increasingly turn to private label loans.
That was a prediction that has come true.
Proposed:
Raise loan limits to those
listed in the table below:
| Grade
Level |
Subsidized
Limit |
Unsubsidized
Limit* |
|
All
undergraduate grade levels (1-5) |
$7,000 |
$7,500 |
|
Graduate
Students |
$10,000 |
$15,000 |
*The
unsubsidized amount for grades 1-5 is only awarded to student's
who are considered independents or whose parents are denied parent
loans for credit reasons.
This is a straight-line
inflation increase from the last time loan limits were raised in
1992. Such estimates use the Consumer Price Index (CPI) inflation
index rather than the higher education index (HEPI) since the CPI
is the federal standard and HEPI is less recognized by the federal
government. If we had used HEPI our proposed loan limits would have
been considerably higher.
Possible Objections:
Raising loan limits
will result in an even more unmanageable debt burden for students
and also increase default rates.
A consequence of
raising loan limits would be the increase in subsidies paid to loan
holders by the government.
Counter Argument:
The student loan
industry as a whole is entirely more focused on best practices in
debt management than it was in 1992 when the last loan limit increase
was seen. Schools,
lenders and guaranty agencies are now held accountable for their
default rates and two additional lower payment options have been
developed to assist borrowers with higher debt levels.
The Department of Education has partnered with industry participants
to experiment in better ways to assist borrowers with their debt
levels and best practices such as Voluntary Flexible Agreements
and Experimental Sites.
Raising loan limits
has the potential of increasing loan holder return for very little
additional output. We
therefore suggest that subsidies be decreased accordingly so as
to maintain return and taxpayer costs.
|